Ten modules your team works through together in 2–4 hours — a few honest conversations and a structure you'll actually use. Not a committee. Not a six-month project.
Get the kit — $129 For teams already using AI. Which is to say: your team.Here's what boards don't always hear directly: even when the organization hasn't "adopted AI," staff may already be using it. Usually because they're stretched and the tool helped. Not because they're being reckless.
That's the situation this workbook is built for. Not "should we use AI" — that ship sailed when your comms lead discovered ChatGPT could draft the newsletter. The real question is whether the use that's already happening has shared boundaries, named reviewers, and a team that knows what to do when something goes sideways. Most organizations adopted AI the way they adopted email: one person started, it worked, others followed. Nobody wrote the email policy first either.
That one question runs the whole framework. Mild embarrassment — green, go ahead. A donor loses trust — yellow, second pair of eyes. Someone gets harmed or their privacy violated — red, stop and ask. And if a use case is hard to classify, it's yellow until you decide otherwise.
All ten modules
The governance gap, Canada's regulatory patchwork (PIPEDA, Law 25, Bill 194, the voluntary code), and the donor trust math. Your board's fiduciary duty, named plainly.
The AI inventory — every tool in use, including the ones people adopted on their own. Most organizations are surprised by what this turns up. Plus the five vendor questions to ask before any tool touches sensitive data.
The classification system your staff can run in the moment — instead of a 30-page policy nobody reads. You sort your real use cases, in the room, together.
Short enough to memorize. Print it, tape it next to the screen, make it part of onboarding. With the safe-vs-unsafe prompt pairs that make it click.
AI drafts. Humans decide. Walkthroughs for the three scenarios that actually come up: communications, donor engagement, and client-facing tools — each with its own checklist.
Something will. The blame-free incident protocol — because if people are afraid to report mistakes, they hide them, and hidden mistakes compound.
OCAP® and CARE, and the question that reframes everything: not "is this allowed under our privacy policy?" but "are we operating under the direction of the people this data belongs to?"
The three-layer structure — board policy, staff guidelines, one-pager — with sample language to copy, paste, and adapt for each.
The minimum training checklist. Can your staff name five never-enter items without looking? That's the test — not whether they sat through a lecture.
The five review triggers and a review plan, so the policy stays a living document instead of a binder on a shelf.
Also inside
The Smallest Viable Policy. If you're very small and very stretched, skip straight here — governance for a team of three, ready in an hour. Grow it when you're ready.
The Language Bank. Ready-to-adapt wording for the moments that stall people: introducing the policy to your board, the motion language, answering the board member who asks "why do we need this?", announcing it to staff, responding when a donor asks about AI, grant application language, vendor questions, and the incident report template.
The Canadian resource directory. CCNDR, Imagine Canada, the RAISE program, the Privacy Commissioner, OCAP® training, and more — plus the full source list behind the research, so you can check our work.
What you might be thinking
The workbook comes in the kit — with the board-ready Policy Template, the done-for-you tools, and the companion white paper. Ten modules, the Smallest Viable Policy, the Language Bank, and the Canadian resource directory. One price, everything.
Get the kit — $129Your team is already mid-experiment. This just gives the experiment guardrails.
The workbook is half of the kit. The board-ready Policy Template is the other half — both are in the $129 kit, with nothing else to buy.